Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance

Table. 3.

Distribution of the methods and probe types used for the FISH survey and the results for the participants from 2016

Specimen   Intended responsesManufacturer Probe typeNo. of laboratoriesNo. of participants with an acceptable response (n/N*, %)
GF-16-01Consistent with trisomy 21VysisSingle color418/19 (94.7)
Dual color3
Dual fusion2
Extra signal1
CytoCellDual color3
Single color2
MetaSystemsDual color2
Dual fusion1
OthersDual color1
GF-16-02Abnormal with a gain of MLLVysisBreak-apart1425/25 (100.0)
Dual color1
CytoCellBreak-apart2
Dual color1
MetaSystemsBreak-apart5
Dual color1
Dual fusion1
GF-16-03Abnormal with a deletion of 13q14.3VysisSingle color319/19 (100.0)
Dual color3
CytoCellDual color6
MetaSystemsDual color6
Triple color1
GF-16-04Abnormal with a gain of IGHVysisBreak-apart616/16 (100.0)
Dual color1
CytoCellBreak-apart2
Dual fusion1
MetaSystemsBreak-apart6
GF-16-05Abnormal with a loss of TP53VysisDual color520/20 (100.0)
CytoCellDual color5
MetaSystemsDual color10
GF-16-06Mosaic XVysisDual color918/18 (100.0)
Triple color1
CytoCellDual color5
MetaSystemsDual color2
Dual fusion1

The following FISH methods were used: Vysis (Downers Grove, IL, USA), CytoCell (Cambridge, UK), and MetaSystems (Altlussheim, Germany).

Abbreviation: FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization.

n/N indicates the acceptable number/total number of participants.

J Lab Med Qual Assur 2018;40:188~198 https://doi.org/10.15263/jlmqa.2018.40.4.188
© Lab Med Qual Assur